“I would die for her. I would kill for her. Either way, what bliss.” Gomez Addams
June 7, 20 23, And Every Wednesday
By Linda Case Gibbons, Esq.
(Check out Lest We Forget and FYI.)
“The hurrier I go, the behinder I get.”
The FBI could be the poster child for this old adage.
However hard they try, these guys never get there in time. Never get “it” done.
After the attack on Benghazi, the FBI took two weeks to get there to “examine the evidence.”
When the department was handed Hunter’s laptop, the FBI kept it for five years, but never examined it.
But, let’s begin with a disclaimer. Wray can’t be blamed for his dismissive attitude, or his Strzok/Comey-sneering face.
He’s just following in their footsteps.
Despite the fact that Hillary deleted 33,000 e-mails, and free-ranged other confidential documents to our enemies and Anthony Wiener’s laptop, former FBI Director James Comey said he couldn’t justify her being prosecuted. Even though that was not his decision to make.
Now, here we go again, this time with FBI Director, Christopher Wray.
Wray was subpoenaed by Congress to produce a document, FD-1023, after a whistleblower came forward and alleged it contained evidence of then-Vice President Joe’s involvement in a criminal scheme with a foreign national.
Allegedly this scheme resulted in Joe accepting $5 million dollars in exchange for policy decisions.
Wray denied the document existed. For a month.
“We’ve asked the FBI to not only provide this record, but to also inform us what it did to investigate these allegations,” the Committee said in a statement. “The FBI has failed to do both.”
Wray eventually admitted the document did exist, but refused to release it.
“You can’t have it,” was kinda' his message. “If you want it, you can come see it. But you can’t have it.”
“Releasing confidential source information could potentially jeopardize investigations and put lives at risk,” the FBI announced in a statement.
Whose lives would that be? Whistleblowers? No. There’s a law against that.
Although…
After IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley testified before the House Ways and Means Committee about the preferential treatment the five-year investigation into Hunter Biden tax investigation was given;
And after the lead IRS case agent supported his claim;
On May 15 the IRS removed the entire 13-person investigative team.
Yesterday, after Chairman Comer, and ranking member Rep. Raskin were allowed to review the document in question, Rep. Anna Luna (R-Fla.) tweeted something odd.
“Just left meeting for House Oversight. The FBI is afraid their informant will be killed if unmasked, based on the info he has brought forward about the Biden family.”
That doesn’t sound so much as FBI "concern," as it does a threat.
Wray has slow-walked this whole thing, so what’s the worst that can happen to him?
Comer says the Committee will hold him in contempt of Congress. On Thursday. And we know how effective a contempt citation is.
Former Attorney General Eric Holder refused to produce documents connected with Fast and Furious. And since the Department of Justice would have had to bring the case, he got away with it.
This was while former senior counselor to President Trump, (emphasis on Trump), Steve Bannon was sentenced to four months in jail for ignoring a Congressional subpoena.
But nothing will happen to Wray. Just as nothing happened to Hillary for destroying subpoenaed emails. Yes, they were subpoenaed.
So the question comes to mind, “What do these men, in service to the American people, Garland, Comey, Barr, Holder, Wray, what do they stand for?
What will they die for?
It’s certainly not to protect the rule of law.
It isn’t to defend the United States of America.
And it really isn’t to protect President Joe.
It’s to protect the man who was president during Joe and Crooked Hillary’s transgressions. The man who gave us the FBI we have today.
And in protecting him, they protect their own hides.
Hold the line, America.
Stay strong, Patriots.